The analogy sort of fits; and what put me in mind of it was the news this week that the FBI has commenced a project to create a hi-tech facial recognition database.
We of course, are concerned about a different set of ‘Feds’ right now.
The Federal Reserve’s interest rate decision will come at 1630 GMT, and will be followed by Chairman Ben Bernanke’s press briefing.
Watch it here. [That’s the Fed’s official www.ustream.tv/ channel.]
I don’t know what Ben Bernanke will say. I know what I think it would be logical and prudent for him to say.
I’m not alone either.
Whilst we know that a majority of professional economists polled by Bloomberg [paragraph 5] and Reuters [paragraph 3], expect a third round of quantitative easing, a minority disagrees.
I’m with that minority.
The logic of those who disagree goes, a-little-something, like, this:
- In theory, quantitative easing is meant to impact the real economy through a two major channels.
- Via the interest rate channel, QE is meant to lower borrowing costs and consequently increase borrowing activity and then real investment in property, plant and equipment.
- However it’s clear that QE’s most important channel is not a formal one. Rather it can be argued that sentiment is at least as powerful a channel as interest rates.
- We know that the QE has lifted 5Y US Treasury yields ~35bp from the first mention in Bernanke’s Jackson Hole speech in late August 2010 through to its formal end on June 30, 2011).
- Over that same period S&P 500 rallied 27% and DXY fell by about 15%.
- Right now SPX is around 14% higher on the year, 10-year yields are well off the highs of earlier in the year and 5-year yields much lower than in 2010.
- The ‘real’ trade-weighted dollar is ~3% lower than before QE2.
- You know where I’m going don’t you? The question of whether the financial markets really need a QE3 arises.
- I’m afraid I am going to have to skirt the question of whether the real economy needs [another] one – maybe our experience of the extent of the efficacy of the last two is implicit enough of an answer.
- There would clearly be an element of protection in any decision in going full-on QE tonight.
- However, given the Fed’s robotic drumbeat of readiness to act if needed over the last year, it seems a stretch to think that any market upset resulting from a failure to announce QE today would be akin to semi-catastrophic meltdown.
- The market reaction might certainly be cheaper than the QE option.
You must be logged in to post a comment.